Just Because It's Trending Doesn't Mean It's True — Fact checking at the speed of likes since 2015
Links
Contacteer ons in het geval van niet werkende links op info@skepp.be.

By leading popular philosopher and author Dr. Stephen Law (betalend)
This course aims to make you a more rigorous, effective, and creative thinker.
I have taught philosophy and critical thinking at Oxford University and the University of London. I've also written online courses for both Oxford University and Eton College, and published numerous popular philosophy books.
This course distils what I have found to be the most engaging and generally useful critical thinking material. It sharpens up thinking skills that you can then usefully apply in your career, your education, and in your personal life too.
The course develops skills and habits we all need to become more reliable judges of what's true:
- skills that make us more penetrating thinkers - so that we are better able to both figure out for ourselves, and rationally persuade others, of what's true.
- skills of intellectual self-defence - that can help immunise us against the influence of bad arguments, propaganda, psychological manipulation, prejudice, fake news, and bullshit.
Becoming a better critical thinker is not just an intellectual exercise. It's also about developing awareness, and especially self-awareness - of the biases and prejudices to which we're all prone and which may skew our judgement.
This course is designed to be highly engaging and accessible. I'm one of the world's leading popularizers of critical thinking and philosophy, with a reputation for explaining even complex ideas clearly.
The course is grounded in some of the most up-to-date research and thinking.
The course is unusual in that, while it covers the fundamentals - including cognitive biases, fallacies, and the basics of argumentation - it includes extra material students find particularly useful outside the classroom.
Feeling stuck or confused? You can communicate with me inside the course - I'll usually get back to you within 24 hours! There are some optional easy quizzes to help your understanding.

betransparent.be is een centraal en openbaar platform waarlangs premies en voordelen tussen de farmaceutische bedrijven en de bedrijven van medische hulpmiddelen enerzijds en de gezondheidszorgbeoefenaars, –instellingen en patiëntenverenigingen anderzijds op bevattelijke wijze in kaart worden gebracht. Het is het resultaat van zelfregulering vanuit de bedrijven in nauwe samenwerking met verschillende verenigingen van gezondheidszorgbeoefenaars (artsen, apothekers, dierenartsen, tandartsen, verpleegkundigen, kinesitherapeuten, paramedici, ziekenhuistechnici), dat uiteindelijk is uitgegroeid tot een wettelijke plicht.

Ask for Evidence is a campaign launched by Sense about Science that helps people request for themselves the evidence behind news stories, marketing claims and policies.

Die boekje, dat over de onzin van homeopathie handelt, werd in 1894 gepubliceerd.

In Nederland wordt al sinds 1941 voorlichting gegeven over goed eten door het Voedingscentrum (dat toen nog Voorlichtingsbureau van den Voedingsraad heette). Sindsdien is er veel veranderd. Het aanbod van eten en drinken is enorm gegroeid: op steeds meer plekken kun je voedsel de hele dag door kopen. Juist in deze tijd is voorlichting nodig over wat goed eten is. Daarvoor krijgen we voor 100% subsidie vanuit de overheid.

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) is an independent global health research center at the University of Washington.
These five principles guide everything IHME does.
1. Scientific Excellence: Because everyone deserves to live a long life in full health, better evidence of what works and what doesn’t is needed to help society achieve this goal. Sound evidence must come from rigorous measurement and adhere to the principles of scientific inquiry. To that end, above all else, we pursue excellence in scientific advancement aimed at improving population health.
2. Policy Relevance: We will measure what is important for guiding health policy, not just what is easy to measure. To better guide health policy, we make our findings comparable across time and populations using the most recent data available, and we provide information at the most local area of measurement possible.
3. Impartiality: For health evidence to be useful, it also must be credible, generated by a scientific process unimpeded by political, financial, or other types of interference. IHME was created to fill a gap in global health: to separate the measurement and evaluation of health policies and programs from the process of creating, implementing, and advocating for policies and programs.
4. Collaboration: To help people live longer lives in better health worldwide, we work with a broad network of researchers, statisticians, and policymakers, following a science-based, collaborative approach. We also foster a transparent and constructive dialogue and debate about all aspects of health measurement.
5. Knowledge Sharing: Because health improvement often starts from within communities, we invite the public to help us interpret our results and advance health metrics and evaluation through reports, policy discussions, data visualizations, and other activities. We also believe it is crucial to cultivate the next generation of leaders in health metrics and evaluation through educational programs, trainings, and mentoring.